SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AA conqueror-competitive-landscape

Map who wins an SEO market: recurring domains, winning content themes, keyword coverage, backlink strength, and the openings. Use for a market-level view before picking targets. Requires a connected Conqueror MCP server.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Samuel Noah v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 1 041 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Map who wins an SEO market: recurring domains, winning content themes, keyword coverage, backlink strength, and the openings.

As a process A 83/100 · Runs to the end — weak spots: running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureAI and agentsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
93/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
83
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
A
83/100
Runs to the end
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 83/100

    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 43 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1041 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 220: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 7 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 83.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a coherent SEO competitive landscape workflow that uses a connected Conqueror MCP server and does not add hidden execution, persistence, or unrelated access.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 8 Aug 2026