SKILLEMALL.ai

AC sanctifai

Human-in-the-loop skill for AI agents. Use when your agent needs humans to review, approve, or complete a task. Provides REST API and MCP (Model Context Protocol) integration with long-polling and webhooks. No server required — agents self-register and get responses back asynchronously.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SanctifAI v1.0.2 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 24 980 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Human-in-the-loop skill for AI agents.

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, consistency, execution cost

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Execution cost w 6
10
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning body-long SKILL.md body ≈ 24980 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 10Execution cost. Instruction body is 24980 tokens: crowds the task out of the window
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (sanctifai) differs from the folder (sanctifai-source)
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 85Steps. 28 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Failures and branches. 3 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 287: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 79 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 28 items
  • +4Has examples (90 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a coherent human-review integration, but it needs Review because it can expose task content and files to external workers while also documenting a reusable API key in an MCP URL.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026