SKILLEMALL.ai

AD payment

支付 Skill,识别用户支付/付款/结账意图,或接收其他 skill(如打赏 skill)的调用,执行 scripts/payment_api.py 调用收款码 API,获取 tradeCode 并醒目展示给用户。TRIGGER when: 用户说"我要支付"、"我要付款"、"去支付"、"帮我支付"、"结账"、"付钱"、"买单",或被其他 skill 携带 amount 参数调用。DO NOT TRIGGER when: 用户表达打赏/送礼物/赞赏意图(由 tip skill 处理)。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: sayxxx v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 816 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 47/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
47/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: 支付 Skill,识别用户支付/付款/结账意图,或接收其他 skill(如打赏 skill)的调用,执行 scripts/payme… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 47/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (payment) differs from the folder (paymax)
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Steps. 18 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 816 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 246: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
    • +4Has examples (14 code blocks)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill does what it says, but it creates payment requests through an unverified external payment service without a clear final user confirmation or provider disclosure.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026