SKILLEMALL.ai

AB biomedical-patent-trends

Download, search, and analyze Patent-Mol-Wiki biomedical-patent packages. Use when users ask what happened in a recent patent period, need portfolio or trend statistics from wiki index.md files, ask whether a target, disease, modality, organization, or patent is present, need charts of patent distributions, or need molecular-structure analysis from selected patent folders.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SciMiner v1.0.0 MIT-0 9 files body ≈ 1 818 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Download, search, and analyze Patent-Mol-Wiki biomedical-patent packages.

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
50
Tools and files w 18
60
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "credential_files"

    Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 17 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1818 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 375: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 17 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 5 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill matches its patent-analysis purpose, but its downloader can send the SciMiner API key to any URL returned by the provider response.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · 21 Jul 2026