SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BB alibabacloud-emas-apm-query

Alibaba Cloud EMAS APM (mobile Application Performance Monitoring) issue troubleshooting skill. Covers the 4 read-only OpenAPIs exposed by the `aliyun emas-appmonitor` plugin: `get-issues` / `get-issue` / `get-errors` / `get-error`. Capabilities: Top-N aggregation, sample stack drill-down and dimension breakdowns for 6 issue types (crash / anr / lag / custom / memory_leak / memory_alloc), combined with the user's source code (Java / Kotlin / Objective-C / Swift / ArkTS / Dart / C# / JS) to produce root cause analysis and fix suggestions. Client coverage: native Android / iOS / HarmonyOS, Flutter, Unity (bundled to android / iphoneos / harmony; H5 is out of scope). Triggers: analyze app crash, troubleshoot ANR, APM crash investigation, list top issues, "what is this digestHash", iOS ANR Top 5, Android memory leak analysis, Flutter custom exception stacks, pull lag samples, emas appmonitor usage, sort issues by error rate, map stack to source, appKey problem, EMAS APM issue analysis, analyze APM issues.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: alibabacloud-skills-team v0.0.1 MIT-0 32 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 4 723 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process B 71/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice

AnalyzerSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
86/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
90
Quality 40%
80
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
71/100
Nearly there
Running it twice w 4
30
Result and completion w 14
40
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Dangerous commands medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill contains commands that delete files, rewrite disks or execute code fetched from the network. The agent may run them without asking if it believes the instructions require it.

For the author

Replace destructive commands with safe equivalents that ask for confirmation, scope them to one folder, and stop piping curl into a shell: pin a version and a checksum.

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 2

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 2
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:37
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions
    sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
  • medium Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:43
    Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions
    sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/

Files scanned: 32. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 71/100

  • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4723 tokens
  • 100Steps. 32 steps
  • 100Failures and branches. 7 branches, has a failure section
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +3Description length 1016: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 32 items
  • +4Has examples (12 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (13 of 13)
  • +3All 2 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a coherent read-only Alibaba Cloud EMAS APM troubleshooting skill, but its outputs can contain sensitive crash, device, user, and business-log data.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026