AC alibabacloud-network-reachability-analysis
Perform Alibaba Cloud NIS (Network Intelligence Service) network path reachability analysis with forward/reverse path diagnosis, topology visualization, and resource monitoring. Use when analyzing network connectivity, diagnosing unreachable paths, checking security groups or route tables, or visualizing network topology between cloud resources. Triggers: "reachability analysis", "network path analysis", "NIS analysis", "connectivity diagnosis", "path reachable", "network troubleshooting", "可达性分析", "网络路径分析", "NIS分析", "连通性诊断", "路径可达", "网络排障".
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 4
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 4
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:30Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:45Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:58Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
security skill -
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegereferences/cli-installation-guide.md:71Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
security skill
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 12 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70Failures and branches. 5 branches
- 100Steps. 23 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3217 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 547: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 18 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 23 items
- +4Has examples (8 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.