SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC alibabacloud-waf-security-monitor

Perform security inspection and monitoring for Alibaba Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall), covering CNAME-based domain access, hybrid cloud access, and cloud product access assets. Supports querying Web attacks, CC attacks, Bot attacks, API security events, traffic analysis (QPS/bandwidth), HTTP status code anomalies (4xx/5xx period-over-period), protection status, certificate expiry, and instance asset inventory. Use this Skill when users need WAF security inspection, protection status checks, attack event queries, traffic anomaly investigation, or to confirm whether WAF products are provisioned. Triggers: "WAF inspection", "WAF security check", "Web attack query", "traffic anomaly", "certificate check"

ClawHub Agent Skills author: alibabacloud-skills-team v0.0.2 MIT-0 15 files body ≈ 4 997 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Perform security inspection and monitoring for Alibaba Cloud WAF (Web Application Firewall), covering CNAME-based domain access, hybrid cloud access, and…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
96
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Result and completion w 14
40
When it triggers w 12
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 5

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Medium and low: 5
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:30
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
      sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
      security skill
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:45
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
      sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
      security skill
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:58
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
      sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
      security skill
    • low Dangerous commands cmd-privilege references/cli-installation-guide.md:71
      Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation of a security skill)
      sudo mv aliyun /usr/local/bin/
      security skill

    A further 1 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.

    Files scanned: 15. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4997 tokens
    • 85Steps. 11 steps, 1 vague phrases
    • 100Failures and branches. 1 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 715: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 20 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)
    • +3All 3 scripts are documented

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 96.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This WAF monitoring skill is mostly purpose-aligned, but it needs Review because it can change the local CLI/plugin environment and writes raw WAF inspection data to a shared temporary log file.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 9 Jul 2026