AB youtube-knowledge-extractor
Multimodal YouTube video analysis through both audio (transcript) and visual (frame extraction + image analysis) channels. Especially powerful for HowTo videos, tutorials, demos, and explainer videos where what is SHOWN (screenshots, UI demos, diagrams, code, physical actions) is just as important as what is SAID. Use this skill whenever a user wants to analyze, summarize, or create step-by-step guides from YouTube videos, or when they share a YouTube URL and want to understand what happens in the video. Triggers on requests like "Analyze this YouTube video", "Create a step-by-step guide from this video", "What does this video show?", "Summarize this tutorial", or any YouTube URL shared with analysis intent.
As a process B 68/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice, progress reporting
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 68/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 20 steps
- 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2513 tokens
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 717: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 20 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (17 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.