SKILLEMALL.ai

BD macmini-knowledge-base

⚠️ **本 skill 包含以下高危能力,使用前请仔细阅读 SKILL.md 顶部「⚠️ CAPABILITIES & RISKS」章节**: - Shell 执行 + 文件读写 + 安装 Homebrew 包(版本固定)+ 下载 Ollama 模型 - 修改 OpenClaw 配置 + 注册持久 cron 任务 + 飞书 webhook 推送 在 Mac Mini (M4) 上快速搭建本地知识库 + RAG 自然语言搜索系统。 适用场景: - 新 Mac 配置知识库:从零开始安装配置 Ollama、embedding模型、定时任务、文档解析 - 遇到 PDF 提取乱码、定时任务超时、skill 加载失败等问题 - 想要建立每日自动分析文档 + 08:00发送摘要到飞书的流程 - 迁移或复现知识库:打包整个 knowledge 目录和配置到新电脑 - **v1.4 新增**:CMap 残缺度自检(不预设来源)+ 50万字完整提取 + OCR fallback 到 .doc 本 skill 会引导完成:目录结构创建、依赖安装、脚本部署、定时任务注册、OpenClaw 配置。 ⚠️ **重要:能力范围** 本 skill 不只是「搭建」,还包含: - 批量 OCR 修复(扫描 summaries/archives 找乱码 + 重新提取) - 目录归档清理(移动重复/孤儿文件到 .trash/) - 自动定时任务(23:00 分析 + 06:00 飞书推送) 使用前请仔细评估批量修改风险。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: seairteng v1.4.7 MIT-0 9 files · 1 script body ≈ 3 530 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 48/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

IntegrationAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
48/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 48/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 54 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 3530 tokens
  • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • -225 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 656: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 26 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 54 items
  • +4Has examples (18 code blocks)
  • +3All 5 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly transparent about its powerful local automation, but it persists a Feishu webhook secret insecurely and registers recurring jobs with timing ambiguity.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 17 Aug 2026