SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC unified-security

Unified application security skill for Coding Agent systems like OpenCode. Use when reviewing or writing code that touches authentication, authorization, user input, payments, database access, secrets, deployment, dependencies, or AI/agent workflows. Includes OWASP Top 10 (2025), ASVS 5.0 highlights, agentic AI security, vibe-coded pitfalls, insecure defaults detection, supply chain risk signals, and CI/CD agent action hardening.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Selim v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 1 553 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerGitHubAI and agentsSoftware developmentInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (unified-security) differs from the folder (unified-security-auditor)
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 91 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1553 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 433: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 19 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 91 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a security-review guidance skill with no executable code, though users should control when it saves audit reports to a project.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026