BC sn-da-image-caption
图片理解与数据提取 skill。当图片文件（.png/.jpg/.jpeg/.gif/.webp/.bmp）是主要输入且用户需要理解、提取数据或分析图片内容时使用。提供预配置的 caption 脚本（scripts/caption.py），通过 vision 模型将图片转为文本描述，无需额外配置 API Key。覆盖：(1) 通过 scripts/caption.py 对图表/表格/截图/流程图进行 caption，(2) 将 caption 文本解析为结构化 DataFrame，(3) 基于提取数据重新生成可视化图表，(4) 导出为 Excel/CSV。**遇到以下任一情况就主动使用本 skill，不要自行猜测图片内容**：①用户出现触发词：图片分析 / 图表提取 / 表格识别 / OCR / 图片描述 / 截图分析 / 图表数据 / 提取图片中的数据 / 图片转表格 / 识别图片 / image caption / extract data from image / chart analysis / table OCR；②用户上传或指定了图片文件（.png / .jpg / .jpeg / .gif / .webp / .bmp）并要求理解、提取数据或分析内容；③任务需要从图表截图、表格截图、UI 截图、流程图中提取结构化信息；④用户要求将图片中的数据转为 Excel/CSV 或重新生成可视化图表。仅不用于：图片编辑（裁剪、滤镜、缩放）、图片生成、不含数据的风景/人物照片描述。
图片理解与数据提取 skill。当图片文件（.png/.jpg/.jpeg/.gif/.webp/.bmp）是主要输入且用户需要理解、提取数据或分析图片内容时使用。提供预配置的 caption 脚本（scripts/caption.py），通过 vision 模型将图片转为文本描述，无需额外配置 API…
As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The instructions or scripts send data out: environment variables, keys, file contents, chat history. You may never notice, because the agent performs the upload as "part of the task".
If the upload is not needed for the task, remove it: catalogs flag such skills and delist them. If it is needed, name the destination explicitly, say what leaves the machine, and give the user a switch.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Exfiltration
net-redirectable-api-keyscripts/caption.py:58Helper sends the API key to a host configured by an environment variable — the key can be redirected to another serverAPI key + configurable base URL from environment
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 85Steps. 13 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1782 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 651: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 17 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.