SKILLEMALL.ai

AC sn-image-doctor

Environment diagnostic skill for SenseNova-Skills project. Checks that sn-image-base is properly installed and configured, validates dependencies and environment variables. Prompts user to configure missing required variables and saves them to .env file. After configuration, reloads environment and suggests agent restart if needed.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SenseNova-Skills v2026.9.11 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 1 229 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

Environment diagnostic skill for SenseNova-Skills project.

As a process C 60/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, progress reporting

AnalyzerAI and agentsSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
77
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
60/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv SKILL.md:160
    Reads a .env file
    source .env  # Or use a tool like python-dotenv

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "triggers"

Process rating: all ten parameters 60/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 11 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1229 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 333: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 15 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is a plausible SenseNova environment checker, but it needs review because normal diagnostics may expose API configuration and the documented credential setup does not match the shipped script.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 11 Sept 2026