BD grocery-checklist
Persistent pantry-backed grocery checklist for OpenClaw, intended for normal conversational use with Telegram shopping-list UI.
As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlindex.js:442Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)const result = await httpsPost(`https://api.telegram.org/bot${token}/${method}`, payload);placeholder -
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlscripts/grocery.py:495Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)req = request.Request(f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/{method}", data=data, method="POST")vendor-hostquoted -
low Exfiltration
exfil-webhook-urlscripts/telegram_bot.py:50Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (the skill's own vendor host; quoted — discussed, not commanded)req = request.Request(f"https://api.telegram.org/bot{token}/{method}", data=data, method="POST")vendor-hostquoted
Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (grocery-checklist) differs from the folder (grocery-assistant)
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 24 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 409 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4Structure: 1 headings, hard to scan
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -33 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 127: enough signal without eating the budget
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 24 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 77.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This grocery checklist skill mostly matches its purpose, but it needs Review because it can send stored grocery data through a Telegram bot to fallback recipients and includes under-disclosed session-pruning tooling.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026