SKILLEMALL.ai

BF qlcoder-pure-llm

Run the pure-LLM variant of the QLCoder workflow for both CVE samples and local Web App repositories. Supports multi-profile taint-flow analysis with source/sink/sanitizer typing for Java Web and Python Web projects without CodeQL/database build steps.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: SeTG-git v1.0.0 MIT-0 6 files body ≈ 952 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 45/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: /Users/aibot/script/QLCoder复现/qlcoder/cli.py, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/taint_profiles.md, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/workflow.md

ProcedureSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
45/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: /Users/aibot/script/QLCoder复现/qlcoder/cli.py, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/taint_profiles.md, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/workflow.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /Users/aibot/script/QLCoder复现/qlcoder/cli.py
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/taint_profiles.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/workflow.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: /Users/aibot/script/QLCoder复现/qlcoder/cli.py, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/taint_profiles.md, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/workflow.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: /Users/aibot/script/QLCoder复现/qlcoder/cli.py, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/taint_profiles.md, /Users/aibot/.codex/skills/coder-pure-llm/references/workflow.md
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (qlcoder-pure-llm) differs from the folder (sat-agent)
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 100Steps. 42 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 952 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +4No input/output examples
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 252: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 10 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This appears to be a purpose-aligned security scanning skill, but users should run it only on intended repositories and review what files it may read or write.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026