SKILLEMALL.ai

AC code-orchestrator

Route requests across local code exploration, planning, implementation, debugging, refactoring, code security review, safe repo-local command execution, and git hygiene. Use when a coding task inside the current workspace spans multiple stages or when the user explicitly asks which of these coding skills should handle the next step. Do not use for spawning external coding agents, generic skill authoring, or host-level operations. Chinese triggers: 该用哪个技能、先分析还是先写代码、这类任务怎么拆、按什么顺序做、当前代码任务怎么分步.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: sf0799 v0.1.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 272 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
91/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
78
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
56/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 2, column 14: description: Route requests across local code exploration, planning, implementa… ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value

    Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 272 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 495: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 5 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 78.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a low-risk routing skill that only helps choose the right coding workflow skills and does not install or run code itself.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026