BD guomeiqing-safe-install
Safely review and install third-party OpenClaw Skills. Downloads to a temp directory, runs a 7-point security audit, generates a human-readable report, and only installs if safe. Use when asked to "安装 skill", "install skill", "帮我装", "add skill", or "safe install".
As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 12
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 12
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.en.md:29Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| 5 | 🔓 Privilege Escalation | Elevated permissions, modifying system configs |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securityREADME.en.md:55Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)5. ✅ Privilege Escalation — None found
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.en.md:179Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)| Reverse shell patterns (`nc`, `/dev/tcp`, `mkfifo`) | 🔴 DANGER | Remote control |
-
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.en.md:206Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)### Review Item 5: Privilege Escalation 🔓
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.en.md:224Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation table row; documentation of a security skill)| Requests `chmod 777` or overly permissive access | 🔴 DANGER | Reduces security |
tablesecurity skill -
low Risky intent
intent-offensive-securitySKILL.en.md:326Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)5. [✅/⚠️/🔴] Privilege Escalation — <brief description>
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-privilegeSKILL.md:224Privilege escalation / world-writable permissions (documentation table row; documentation of a security skill)| 请求 `chmod 777` 或打开过宽权限 | 🔴 DANGER | 降低安全性 |
tablesecurity skill
A further 5 matches are quotations in this security skill's documentation and are not counted as findings.
Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git, python, node) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 44 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2421 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -257 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 264: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 33 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 44 items
- +4Has examples (24 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 87.