SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BD tw-fashion-social-manager

台灣服飾品牌的社群媒體與 Meta 廣告策略專家。基於 47,000+ 則真實廣告數據，協助規劃貼文內容、廣告文案、標籤組合、發佈時間、三層漏斗策略與台灣在地化行銷。當使用者提到任何下列需求時，都應主動使用此 skill：寫貼文、寫廣告文案、規劃社群內容、選標籤、排發佈時間、設計廣告漏斗、Meta/IG/FB/TikTok 行銷、服飾品牌推廣、台灣電商行銷、診斷廣告成效、平台選擇建議。即使使用者沒有明確說「用這個 skill」，只要涉及社群經營或廣告投放，就應觸發此 skill。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: shangweilin7 v1.0.8 MIT-0 8 files body ≈ 1 016 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureMarketingInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
99
Quality 40%
65
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • low Exfiltration read-dotenv README.md:179
    Reads a .env file
    source .env

Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 35 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1016 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • -242 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -42 reference files, but SKILL.md never points to them: the model will not open them
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 242: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 24 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
  • +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears intended for social-media marketing and analytics, but it asks for broad, persistent Meta account credentials and can run local data-fetching code without tight user-scoped controls.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026