SKILLEMALL.ai

AF self-evolution

Autonomous self-improvement engine that learns from interactions, identifies patterns, and evolves behavior over time. Use when: (1) Analyzing interaction patterns for improvement, (2) Running periodic self-assessment, (3) Extracting reusable patterns from workflows, (4) Optimizing decision-making processes, (5) Integrating feedback into behavioral changes. Triggers on '自我进化', 'self-evolution', '自我改进', '学习模式', 'pattern analysis', 'optimize behavior'.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: shenmeng v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 659 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 41/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/detectors/

IntegrationInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
41/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/detectors/
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/detectors/

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/detectors/
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/detectors/
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (self-evolution) differs from the folder (self-evolution-engine)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 100Steps. 43 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2659 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 454: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 38 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
  • +4Has examples (25 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears aimed at self-improvement, but it asks for broad access to memories and transcripts and can turn them into persistent agent behavior changes.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026