SKILLEMALL.ai

BF bsc-analytics

币安智能链 (BSC) 生态综合分析工具。提供 BSC DeFi 协议分析、链上数据监控、项目评估、投资机会发现和风险预警。当用户需要分析 BSC 生态、评估 BSC 项目、监控链上数据、发现 BNB Chain 投资机会或获取币安链情报时触发此 Skill。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: shenmeng v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 342 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/protocol-database.md, references/chain-metrics.md, references/investment-guide.md

ReferenceInfrastructureData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
63
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: references/protocol-database.md, references/chain-metrics.md, references/investment-guide.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/protocol-database.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/chain-metrics.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/investment-guide.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/protocol_analyzer.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/protocol-database.md, references/chain-metrics.md, references/investment-guide.md
  • 0Tools and files. 4 referenced file(s) missing: references/protocol-database.md, references/chain-metrics.md, references/investment-guide.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (bsc-analytics) differs from the folder (shenmeng-bsc-analytics)
  • 100Steps. 101 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1342 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 14 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 130: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 54 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 101 items
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)
  • +3All 3 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 63.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a BSC analytics package, but it overstates live monitoring capabilities and includes an under-disclosed paid verification flow with an exposed API key.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 28 May 2026