SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC agent-transcript

GitHub PR/issue agent transcripts: redact, preview, and insert safely.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Siduslabs v1.0.0 MIT-0 42 files body ≈ 1 121 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

GitHub PR/issue agent transcripts: redact, preview, and insert safely.

As a process C 51/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, consistency

ProcedureGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
51/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 51/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 30Running it twice. 8 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-transcript) differs from the folder (agent-skills-main)
  • 50When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 70Failures and branches. 4 branches
  • 100Steps. 21 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1121 tokens
  • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 70: 120–800 characters recommended
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 6 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 21 items
  • +4Has examples (7 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The main transcript skill is locally scoped and safety-aware, but the artifact also bundles unrelated high-authority skills and install guidance that do not fit the published skill purpose.
LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 19 Jul 2026