BD simmer-briefing
Daily check-in pattern for Simmer agents. One API call returns portfolio, risk alerts, and opportunities across all venues. Use this in your heartbeat to keep your human informed.
Daily check-in pattern for Simmer agents.
As a process D 49/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- note
edit-residuethe text marks something as outdated (lines 52): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions
Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 100Steps. 12 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1289 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 179: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 10 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 12 items
- +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is mostly coherent as a Simmer portfolio briefing tool, but it lets remote plain-text briefing content steer financial actions without clear user-confirmation boundaries.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026