AD agent-team-orchestration-v3-public
Build and run multi-agent content production teams on OpenClaw with single-repo architecture, symlink-based file sharing, role-specialized AGENTS.md, and automated review-fix-score loops. Use when: (1) Setting up a team of 3+ agents with writer/reviewer/scorer/fixer roles for content creation, (2) Creating a quality-controlled publishing pipeline, (3) Bootstrapping agent workspaces with symlinks and tool configs from scratch, (4) Running multi-round review→fix→score cycles until a quality threshold is met, (5) Debugging agent spawn permissions, tool-call loops, or symlink issues. Based on real production experience building a 6-agent content team (2026-03-30).
As a process D 44/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 8. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 44/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (agent-team-orchestration-v3-public) differs from the folder (openclaw-agent-team-orchestration)
- 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 5 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1063 tokens
- low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 668: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 5 items
- +4Has examples (4 code blocks)
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 91.