BD clawmerge
OpenClaw workspace 备份/恢复/合并工具。 支持:完整备份、合并恢复(不覆盖已有)、Cron 任务备份、会话记录备份、配置导出。 新增:灾难备份包含系统配置 + workspace + sessions;恢复默认安全合并,避免误覆盖运行配置。 触发词:「备份」「恢复」「迁移」「换电脑」「导出配置」「合并记忆」「灾难备份」。 当 workspace 需要迁移、定期备份、或从另一台设备恢复时使用。
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionscripts/backup-cron-tasks.sh:57Mentions editing / listing crontabif crontab -l &>/dev/null; then
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionscripts/backup-cron-tasks.sh:58Mentions editing / listing crontabcrontab -l > "$SYSTEM_CRONTAB_FILE"
-
low Dangerous commands
cmd-cron-mentionscripts/restore-task-scripts.sh:152Mentions editing / listing crontab (string literal in code, not executed)echo " 4. Verify cron jobs: crontab -l"
code literal
Files scanned: 18. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 35 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1844 tokens
- 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
- low 15 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
- low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
- -32 of 12 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 207: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 36 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 35 items
- +4Has examples (21 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
This is a real backup/restore skill, but it handles credentials, sessions, cron, and package installation in ways that need careful review before use.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026