SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AC ai-video

Build and execute skills.video video generation REST requests from OpenAPI specs. Use when user needs to create, debug, or document video generation calls on open.skills.video.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: skills-video v1.0.3 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 1 549 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 2 d ago

Build and execute skills.video video generation REST requests from OpenAPI specs. Use when user needs to create, debug, or document video generation calls on…

As a process C 63/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, running it twice

GeneratorMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
92
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
63/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
When it triggers w 12
20
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

The same skill appears in 1 more place: ClawHub

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 1. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 63/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 37 steps
    • 100Failures and branches. 2 branches, has a failure section
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1549 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 176: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 37 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
    • +3All 5 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 92.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is mostly a disclosed video-generation API helper, but one included helper can send the configured API key to a user-supplied URL outside the intended provider.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026