AB deslop
Deslop, humanize, edit, or audit AI-sounding, robotic, generic, corporate, or ChatGPT-like copy while preserving the writer's voice.
As a process B 70/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, consistency, progress reporting
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 70/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (deslop) differs from the folder (deslop-the-copy)
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Failures and branches. 7 branches
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 56 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2241 tokens
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- high The skill tells the model to perform an irreversible action with no human approval
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 132: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 31 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 56 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 75.
External checks
ClawHub: clean
This is a disclosed writing-editing skill with no code execution, data access, or hidden side effects, though its broad triggers and strict style rule may affect ordinary copy-editing requests.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 22 Jul 2026