SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

CD pm-master

Project & program management skill for the tech industry (waterfall/agile/iteration/hybrid), producing charter, WBS, Gantt, RAID, status reports, stage-gate reviews, EVM control. Also includes: (a) an outbound email communication gateway with mandatory approval + sponsor co-sign, (b) a pre-publish confidentiality/leak scan over package contents, (c) Markdown-to-DOCX export, and (d) SOW/contract-driven expert-role dispatch. Activates on explicit intent to create, plan, execute, monitor, close, or govern a project/program and its artifacts. Do NOT trigger on casual PM advice, status interpretation only, or unrelated planning language.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Stephen v2.2.17 MIT-0 80 files · 28 scripts body ≈ 4 083 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 6 d ago

Project & program management skill for the tech industry (waterfall/agile/iteration/hybrid), producing charter, WBS, Gantt, RAID, status reports, stage-gate…

As a process D 38/100 · Unfinished process — References files that are not bundled: references/methodology-<m>.md, references/phases/<phase>.md, references/methodology-<methodology>.md

GeneratorWordSoftware developmentData and analyticsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
C
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
95
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
38/100
Unfinished process
References files that are not bundled: references/methodology-<m>.md, references/phases/<phase>.md, references/methodology-<methodology>.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

What is at stake

Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.

Broad scope medium severity

Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.

If you install

The skill asks for more than the task needs: broad tool access, credential environment variables, binaries. Every extra permission widens the damage from a mistake or a compromise.

For the author

Narrow allowed-tools and the variable list to the minimum; replace binaries with readable sources or scripts.

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 1

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 1
  • medium Broad scope meta-broad-allowed-tools SKILL.md:1
    Broad tool permissions pre-approved: Bash
    allowed-tools: Read Write Edit Bash Glob Grep Agent TaskCreate TaskUpdate TaskList WebFetch WebSearch

Files scanned: 80. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/methodology-<m>.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/phases/<phase>.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: references/methodology-<methodology>.md
  • note edit-residue the text marks something as outdated (lines 59): check that old rules are not kept next to new ones — the full check reads the text for contradictions

Process rating: all ten parameters 38/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: references/methodology-<m>.md, references/phases/<phase>.md, references/methodology-<methodology>.md
  • 0Tools and files. 3 referenced file(s) missing: references/methodology-<m>.md, references/phases/<phase>.md, references/methodology-<methodology>.md
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (pm-master) differs from the folder (pm-master-2)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
  • 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4083 tokens
  • 85Steps. 25 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (3 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -32 of 28 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 640: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 25 items
  • +4Has examples (5 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (13 of 19)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a broad project-management automation pack with file-writing, sub-agent orchestration, and optional email sending, but those behaviors are disclosed, purpose-aligned, and guarded.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 22 Sept 2026