SKILLEMALL.ai

AD paper-repro-triage

中文论文复现执行工作流。用于用户上传或提供深度学习、机器学习、LLM、CV、NLP、多模态、数据集、benchmark、prompt 工程或 agent 论文的 PDF、arXiv 链接、论文主页、项目页、标题摘要或源码线索,并要求判断可复现性、搜索官方代码、检查本地源码、追踪数据集论文源码、定位数据处理代码、自动 clone 仓库,或在无线上/本地源码但具备复现条件时生成符合常见 PyTorch 开源项目直觉的复现工程。最终写入 Markdown 报告,聊天只返回极简中文摘要。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: slight-leaves v1.0.0 MIT-0 13 files body ≈ 2 110 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 46/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

ProcedureAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
90/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
74
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
46/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 13. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 46/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, web, git, python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Steps. 72 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2110 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (8 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -5TODO / placeholder text left in the skill
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 242: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 72 items
  • +4Has examples (6 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
  • +3All 6 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This skill is a disclosed paper-reproduction helper that clones or inspects research code and writes local reports, with clear limits against installing dependencies, downloading datasets, or running training automatically.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026