SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BF mistake-assistant

智能错题管理助手，支持错题记录、分类整理、复习提醒、统计分析和导出分享。使用场景：(1) 记录做错的题目（支持手动录入、OCR识别、截图上传）(2) 按科目/知识点/难度分类管理错题 (3) 智能复习提醒（艾宾浩斯遗忘曲线）(4) 分析薄弱知识点和错误趋势 (5) 导出错题本为Markdown/PDF/HTML格式。适用于学生备考、刷题复习、知识巩固等场景。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smallKeyboy v1.0.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 731 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 35/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: templates/export_template.md, templates/report_template.html

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
35/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: templates/export_template.md, templates/report_template.html
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 10. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/export_template.md
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: templates/report_template.html

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: templates/export_template.md, templates/report_template.html
  • 0Tools and files. 2 referenced file(s) missing: templates/export_template.md, templates/report_template.html
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Steps. 41 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 731 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 180: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 17 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 41 items
  • +4Has examples (9 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (2 of 2)
  • +3All 4 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This study-helper skill is mostly coherent, but it needs review because its file writes are too loosely scoped for a tool that stores and exports private study records.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026