SKILLEMALL.ai

BF smyx-crop-yield-prediction-analysis

Predicts expected yield of economic crops such as tomato, corn and potato by combining growth stage, nutrition status, environmental data and historical yield references. | 结合生长阶段、营养状况、环境数据与历史产量数据,预测番茄/玉米/土豆等经济作物的预期产量。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.8 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 631 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Predicts expected yield of economic crops such as tomato, corn and potato by combining growth stage, nutrition status, environmental data and historical yield…

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
Steps w 15
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

  • 0Steps. Prose only: no discrete steps
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1631 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -270 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 218: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 33 headings
  • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill appears to be a crop-yield analysis wrapper, but it silently creates or reuses an identity, stores account tokens locally, and sends user media plus identity data to remote APIs with limited user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 30 Aug 2026