SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-flowering-fruit-set-rate-analysis-analysis

AI-powered flowering and fruit-set rate analysis for tomato / chili plants. From home grow-box or mobile phone images of flowering/fruit clusters, uses object-detection models to count open flowers (fully-opened corolla with visible stamens) and successfully-set young fruits (enlarged ovary, ~0.5-1cm green baby fruits), and computes fruit-set rate = young fruits / flowers × 100%. Helps growers evaluate pollination, nutrition and environmental adaptability, and guides hand-assisted pollination or water/fertilizer adjustment. Scenarios: home smart grow-boxes, greenhouses, balcony vegetable gardens. | 通过家庭种植箱或手机拍摄的植株花果图像(包含花穗、果实区域),利用AI视觉目标检测模型识别开放花朵(花冠完全展开、雄蕊可见)的数量以及已坐果的小果(子房膨大、直径约0.5-1cm的绿色幼果)数量,计算坐果率(小果数/花朵数 × 100%)。该技能帮助种植者评估授粉效果、营养状况及环境适应性,指导人工辅助授粉或调整水肥管理。应用场景:家庭智能种植箱、温室大棚、阳台菜园。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.10 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 442 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1442 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -256 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 791: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill mostly matches a cloud plant analysis tool, but it has risky hidden identity, token storage, plaintext development API configuration, and server-triggered payment-skill promotion behavior that users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 7 Sept 2026