SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-fruit-ripeness-grading-analysis

AI-powered fruit ripeness grading for tomatoes / strawberries. From smart grow-boxes or mobile phone images, uses AI vision to detect fruit color (green / light green / orange / red / dark red), colored-area ratio, gloss, and relative fruit size (against a reference object), and outputs a ripeness grade (Mature-Green / Turning / Ripe / Over-Ripe) based on preset standards. Helps growers identify the optimal harvest window and ensures flavor and shelf quality. Scenarios: smart grow-boxes, greenhouses, home vegetable gardens, fruit & vegetable cooperatives. | 通过智能种植箱或手机拍摄的果实图像,利用AI视觉分析技术检测果实的颜色(绿/浅绿/橙/红/暗红)、着色面积比例、光泽度以及果实大小(相对于参照物),根据预设的成熟度分级标准输出等级(青熟期/转色期/成熟期/过熟期)。该技能帮助种植者确定最佳采收时机,保证果实口感和商品性。应用场景:智能种植箱、温室大棚、家庭菜园、果蔬合作社。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.9 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 386 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 4 d ago

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1386 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -256 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 727: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s fruit analysis purpose is plausible, but it uses cloud identity, token storage, history lookup, and plaintext development HTTP endpoints in ways users should review before installing.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 9 Sept 2026