SKILLEMALL.ai

BF smyx-infant-stool-color-abnormality-analysis

Using a fixed camera above the baby-changing table or a smartphone, the system captures high-resolution images of the diaper area (or the stool itself), and uses AI visual analysis to identify stool color: normal yellow / yellow-green, abnormal clay-pale (white/clay-like, suggesting biliary obstruction), bright red (lower-GI bleeding), dark red / tarry black (upper-GI bleeding), etc. | 通过婴儿护理台上方固定摄像头或手机拍摄尿不湿区域(或直接拍摄排泄物)的高清图像,利用AI视觉分析技术识别大便颜色,包括正常黄色/黄绿色、异常陶土色(白陶土样,提示胆道梗阻)、鲜红色(下消化道出血)、暗红色/黑色(上消化道出血)等。当检测到异常颜色时,输出风险提醒,建议家长及时就医。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.8 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 685 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Using a fixed camera above the baby-changing table or a smartphone, the system captures high-resolution images of the diaper area (or the stool itself), and…

As a process F 32/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerSoftware developmenttype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
32/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 32/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 21Steps. 1 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1685 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -258 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 530: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s main analysis function is real, but it handles sensitive infant health images through cloud APIs while automatically creating or reusing hidden identity records and storing tokens locally.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 29 Aug 2026