SKILLEMALL.ai

BD smyx-plant-growth-stage-detection-analysis

AI-powered plant growth stage auto-detection from periodic full-plant images via smart pot / greenhouse fixed cameras. Recognizes key phenological features—cotyledon emergence, true-leaf count, flower bud differentiation, blooming, fruit setting, fruit ripening—and identifies the current developmental stage (germination, seedling, vegetative, flowering, fruiting, ripening), enabling precision irrigation/fertilization/lighting control and personalized growing guidance. Scenarios: smart pots, home grow boxes, greenhouses, plant factories. | 通过智能花盆或温室内固定摄像头,定期拍摄植物整体图像,利用AI视觉分析技术识别子叶展开、真叶数量、花芽分化、开花、结果、果实成熟等关键物候特征,自动判定植物当前所处的生长发育阶段(如发芽期、幼苗期、生长期、开花期、结果期、成熟期)。有助于精准农业管理,实现自动化灌溉、施肥、光照调节,并为用户提供种植指导。应用场景:智能花盆、家庭种植机、温室大棚、植物工厂。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.8 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 662 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process D 35/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
35/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 35/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1662 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -277 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 724: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 23 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This plant-analysis skill performs related cloud analysis, but it also silently creates or reuses identities, stores tokens locally, and uses under-disclosed remote endpoints.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 26 Aug 2026