SKILLEMALL.ai

BF smoking-detection-analysis

Automatically detects smoking behavior in target areas based on computer vision; supports real-time detection of video streams, images, and video files; identifies violation smoking behavior and triggers violation alerts, assisting in smoking control safety management for parks/communities/units. | 公共场所吸烟行为智能检测技能,基于计算机视觉自动检测目标区域内的吸烟行为,支持视频流、图片、视频文件实时检测,识别违规吸烟行为,触发违规预警,助力园区/社区/单位控烟安全管理

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.12 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 366 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 31/100 · Will not run — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerMedia and videoInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
31/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 31/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 1 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (smoking-detection-analysis) differs from the folder (smyx-smoking-detection-analysis)
  • 50Steps. 2 steps
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1366 tokens

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -254 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 387: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 19 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill mostly matches smoking detection, but it silently creates or reuses cloud identity, uploads media, queries history, and stores tokens locally with limited user control.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 30 Aug 2026