SKILLEMALL.ai

BF study-analysis

Conducts video analysis of learning behavior for children/students, identifies poor learning habits, provides structured analysis reports and family education improvement suggestions, focusing on learning habit cultivation and behavior correction. | A comprehensive tool designed to analyze video footage of children's and students' learning behaviors. It identifies poor study habits and provides structured analysis reports along with actionable suggestions for family education improvements. The tool is dedicated to fostering positive study habits and facilitating behavioral correction. | 分析孩子学习行为 孩子学习行为分析工具,针对孩子/学生的学习行为进行视频分析,识别不良学习习惯,提供结构化分析报告和家庭教育改善建议,专注学习习惯培养和行为矫正

ClawHub Agent Skills author: smyx-sunjinhui v1.0.16 MIT-0 30 files body ≈ 1 631 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 30/100 · Will not run — weak spots: steps, result and completion, when it triggers

AnalyzerPersonal productivityData and analyticsMedia and videotype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
88/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
69
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
30/100
Will not run
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 30. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 30/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 25Steps. 1 steps
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (study-analysis) differs from the folder (smyx-study-analysis)
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1631 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3No numbered steps or checklist
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -255 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • -32 of 4 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 674: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 20 headings
  • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
  • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
  • +1License stated

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 69.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
The skill’s child study-video analysis purpose is coherent, but it sends sensitive videos and account data through under-secured and under-disclosed cloud/authentication flows that need review before installation.
LLM: suspicious (high) · 7 Sept 2026