BF paper-reading-experiment-design
Use when the user has a method idea or Committed Method Design and reads papers to design tasks, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, human evaluation, user studies, or a claim-to-evidence experiment plan.
Use when the user has a method idea or Committed Method Design and reads papers to design tasks, datasets, baselines, metrics, ablations, human evaluation…
As a process F 54/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: references/workspace-structure.md, references/source-experiment-context-template.md, references/claim-evidence-map-template.md
How to improve
- The SKILL.md body is over 5,000 tokens: move reference detail into references/ and load it when needed.
- The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
body-longSKILL.md body ≈ 5662 tokens (recommended < 5000); move details to references/ - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/workspace-structure.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/source-experiment-context-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/claim-evidence-map-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/experiment-design-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/baseline-pressure-matrix-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/claim-metric-map-template.md - warning
missing-refreference to a missing file: references/ablation-and-controls-template.md
Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100
- 0Tools and files. 7 referenced file(s) missing: references/workspace-structure.md, references/source-experiment-context-template.md, references/claim-evidence-map-template.md
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (paper-reading-experiment-design) differs from the folder (07-experiment-design)
- 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
- 70Failures and branches. 6 branches
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 5662 tokens
- 85Steps. 197 steps, 1 vague phrases
- 100Result and completion. Output format and completion criterion are stated
- 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
- low 19 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 209: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 20 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 197 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 65.