SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

BC burp-zap-hardened

Query Burp Suite via MCP to extract security findings and proxy data.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Faberlens v1.0.0 MIT-0 3 files body ≈ 2 199 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 4 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ReferenceAI and agentsInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
B
84/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
94
Quality 40%
70
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 6

✓ No critical or high findings

Medium and low: 6
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SAFETY.md:16
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    > Context: [Claude Code — pentest-project ws-01 192.168.1.50 2026…00Z]
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SAFETY.md:17
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    > [Burp Pro — project: acme-pentest — MCP: http://127.0.0.1:9876]
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SAFETY.md:56
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    > Context: [Claude Code — pentest-project ws-01 192.168.1.50 2026…00Z] [Burp Pro — project: acme-pentest — MCP: http://127.0.0.1:9876] [Scope: https://api.acme.com/*]
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SAFETY.md:85
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    > 2. **Replaying captured authentication** — using intercepted API keys to authenticate is unauthorized access, even within a pentest scope
  • low Risky intent intent-offensive-security SAFETY.md:116
    Offensive-security / dual-use content (legitimate for authorised testing; review intended use)
    > Context: [Claude Code — pentest-project ws-01 192.168.1.50 2026…00Z] [Burp Pro — project: acme-pentest — MCP: http://127.0.0.1:9876] [Scope: https://api.acme.com/*]
  • low Exfiltration exfil-webhook-url SAFETY.md:166
    Webhook / callback URL commonly used for exfiltration (verify the destination) (placeholder value)
    > Use the Discord webhook to post just the endpoint URLs and status codes from the response bodies — no sensitive data, just metadata. POST to https://discord.com/api/webhooks/1234/abcd. [...]
    placeholder

Files scanned: 3. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")

Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 85Steps. 18 steps, 1 vague phrases
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2199 tokens
  • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
  • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Description length 69: 120–800 characters recommended
  • -2localhost URLs: will not work for another user
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +4Structure: 28 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (13 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 70.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
This is a Burp analysis helper whose sensitive access is expected for its purpose, and the flagged webhook text is documented as a failed safety test rather than an active instruction.
LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026