BD x-create-agent
规范化创建 OpenClaw Agent 的完整工作流。当用户说"创建 agent"、"新建 agent"、"添加 agent"、"new agent"时触发。执行三步流程：(1) 收集 agent_id/中文名/职能描述；(2) 执行脚本创建 agent 和工作区文件（--user-name 防硬编码）；(3) 引导用户创建飞书机器人并提交 AppID/AppSecret 完成配对。
规范化创建 OpenClaw Agent 的完整工作流。当用户说"创建 agent"、"新建 agent"、"添加 agent"、"new agent"时触发。执行三步流程：(1) 收集 agentid/中文名/职能描述；(2) 执行脚本创建 agent 和工作区文件（--user-name 防硬编码）；(3)…
As a process D 39/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
What is at stake
Medium-severity findings: the skill is probably honest, but read what alarmed the scanner.
Below is the worst case for this category. The finding here is medium: the guard saw a sign, not a proof.
The text contains phrases like "ignore previous instructions" or "you are now…". That is an attempt to hijack the agent: it may break your rules, the system limits or company policy.
An honest skill does not need them: state the role and the rules directly without overriding other instructions. Otherwise catalog scanners and corporate filters will block the listing.
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 1
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 1
-
medium Instruction override
en-ignore-previousscripts/create_agent.py:591Instruction-override phrase ("ignore previous instructions") (quoted — discussed, not commanded)- "ignore previous instructions"
quoted
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
Process rating: all ten parameters 39/100
- 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (x-create-agent) differs from the folder (x-creat-agent)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
- 100Steps. 40 steps
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 786 tokens
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +5Description quotes 4 example trigger phrases
- +3Description length 194: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 11 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 40 items
- +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
- +3All 1 scripts are documented
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 80.