SKILLEMALL.ai

BC gigma-design-canvas

AI-powered design tool with a real editable canvas and full MCP control. Create, edit, and export social media graphics, thumbnails, banners, cards, and batch designs. 19 MCP tools: add shapes, text, images with masks, layer control, screenshot preview, PNG export up to 3x. Use when the user says 'design an image', 'create a poster', 'make a thumbnail', 'social media graphic', 'batch design', 'create banner', 'Instagram post', 'YouTube thumbnail', or wants to create/edit visual designs programmatically.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: snoopyrain v1.0.1 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 074 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 8 d ago

AI-powered design tool with a real editable canvas and full MCP control.

As a process C 62/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, running it twice, progress reporting

ProcedureYouTubeGoogle CloudFigmaMedia and videoAI and agentsMarketingtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
84
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
62/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
Running it twice w 4
30
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 62/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 16 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Steps. 22 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2074 tokens
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 508: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 28 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 22 items
    • +4Has examples (10 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 84.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    The skill is a disclosed cloud design integration, but its token-in-URL setup can grant broad Gigma project edit, delete, and export access if the MCP link leaks.
    LLM: suspicious (medium) · VirusTotal: · 15 Sept 2026