SKILLEMALL.ai

AC experimentation-and-ab-testing

A/B testing and experimentation for social media content — evidence over opinion, at honest organic-scale rigor. Use when someone wants to "A/B test" or "split test" content, "test which version/hook/time/caption/thumbnail works," "set up an experiment," "what should I test," or to settle a content debate with evidence instead of opinion. Designs disciplined organic tests: one variable, controlled context, a decision rule set BEFORE publishing, enough duration and repetitions to separate signal from noise. Uses the TEST framework. Reads brand-profile + goals-and-kpis first. It DESIGNS the test and drafts variants; WoopSocial schedules them as controlled sequential posts (exception: YouTube's native Test & Compare); the result is read from native analytics via analytics-and-reporting. Organic can't reach true statistical significance; nothing is fabricated or p-hacked. Distinct from analytics-and-reporting (measures) and goals-and-kpis (sets targets).

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Social Media Skills v1.0.1 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 1 191 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

A/B testing and experimentation for social media content — evidence over opinion, at honest organic-scale rigor.

As a process C 58/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

GeneratorYouTubeData and analyticstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
94/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
86
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
58/100
Has gaps
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 58/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 5 mutating operations with no state check
    • 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 9 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1191 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • low No test case covers injection arriving through data

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 964: 120–800 characters recommended
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +4No input/output examples
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 5 example trigger phrases
    • +4Structure: 9 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 9 items
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 86.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill is a coherent social-media experimentation guide that designs controlled tests and does not add hidden execution, persistence, or credential handling.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 27 Jul 2026