AC ugc-and-influencer
UGC and influencer marketing — paid or gifted creator partnerships, briefs, usage rights, and disclosure done right. Use when someone wants to run an influencer campaign, sponsored post, paid or gifted creator partnership, write a creator brief, license/whitelist creator content, source customer UGC, or build a UGC pipeline. Vets creators on engagement + audience quality (not follower count); briefs with guardrails not scripts; inks usage rights up front; enforces FTC/ASA disclosure on EVERY paid AND gifted post; runs the customer-UGC pipeline. Uses the BRIEF framework. Reads brand-profile + goals-and-kpis first. WoopSocial publishes the BRAND'S OWN posts (rights-cleared UGC reshares, campaign posts) — NOT creator DMs/payment/whitelisting/contracts. Undisclosed sponsorship = decline and correct; a tag is not usage permission. Distinct from collabs-and-cross-promotion (mutual, unpaid), creator-monetization (the creator's side), and social-proof-and-testimonials (UGC as proof content).
UGC and influencer marketing — paid or gifted creator partnerships, briefs, usage rights, and disclosure done right.
As a process C 56/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions
How to improve
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 0
✓ No critical or high findings
Files scanned: 6. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec
Process rating: all ten parameters 56/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
- 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
- 100Steps. 10 steps
- 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
- 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1837 tokens
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low No test case covers injection arriving through data
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +3Description length 998: 120–800 characters recommended
- +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
- +4No input/output examples
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +4Structure: 9 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 10 items
- +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (4 of 4)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.