SKILLEMALL.ai

BF collective-memory

Broadcast a single memory note to multiple AI-agent workspaces in one shot, upserting into MEMORY.md / AGENTS.md / TOOLS.md / USER.md across all targets. Pure file-ops, zero network, zero LLM. Works on OpenClaw, Claude Code, Cursor, and any agent runtime that stores per-project memory as Markdown. Triggers: "broadcast memory", "tell every agent", "remember this everywhere", "sync this to all agents", "make all my agents know", "集体记忆", "广播这条记忆", "你们全都记住", "所有agent记住", "大家都记一下", "让他们都记住".

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Evan Song v1.0.0 MIT-0 4 files body ≈ 1 575 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 34 h ago

Broadcast a single memory note to multiple AI-agent workspaces in one shot, upserting into MEMORY.md / AGENTS.md / TOOLS.md / USER.md across all targets. Pure…

As a process F 41/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: scripts/update_memory.py

IntegrationGitHubAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
87/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
67
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
41/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: scripts/update_memory.py
Tools and files w 18
0
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
  2. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 0. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: scripts/update_memory.py

Process rating: all ten parameters 41/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: scripts/update_memory.py
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: scripts/update_memory.py
  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
  • 100Steps. 18 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1575 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. Mutating operations check current state
  • low The response is described with custom markup (4 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +5Description quotes 10 example trigger phrases
  • +3Description length 491: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 13 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 18 items
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 67.

External checks

ClawHub: clean
The skill appears to do what its collective-memory purpose says: persist user-provided notes across agents, but users should be careful because the trigger phrases are broad.
LLM: benign (medium) · VirusTotal: · 20 Jun 2026