SKILLEMALL.ai

AC litho-document-skill

This skill should be used when the user asks to "generate project documentation", "analyze codebase architecture", "create C4 architecture diagrams", "document a repository", "generate technical docs", "使用 Litho 生成文档", "分析代码库架构", "生成架构文档", "为项目生成技术文档", "生成 C4 模型文档", "为这个项目写文档", "自动生成文档", "帮我分析这个代码库", or any request involving automated documentation generation for a software project. This skill enables the AI agent to autonomously analyze any codebase and produce high-quality C4 architecture documentation (Overview, Architecture, Workflow, Deep-Exploration modules, Boundary Interfaces, Database Overview) — equivalent to what deepwiki-rs produces — purely through agent reasoning and tool usage, without depending on any external binary.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Sopaco v1.0.0 MIT-0 7 files body ≈ 962 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 55/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches

GeneratorSoftware developmentWriting and documentsAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
97/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
93
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
55/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 7. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 55/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (litho-document-skill) differs from the folder (litho-documents-skill)
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 42 steps
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 962 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 13 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 743: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 11 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 42 items
    • +4Has examples (2 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (5 of 5)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 93.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This documentation skill is purpose-aligned, but it can broadly analyze a repository and write hidden intermediate files without a strong user-control boundary.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026