SKILLEMALL.ai

BC matchmaker

AI Matchmaker powered by real social media data. Two people scan their accounts — AI cross-analyzes interests, values, lifestyle, aesthetics, and social habits to generate a "Compatibility Report" with match score, chemistry points, friction warnings, and date suggestions. Like astrology but with data. 用真实社交数据算姻缘。两个人各扫一遍社交账号,AI 交叉分析兴趣、三观、生活方式、审美、社交习惯,生成一份「匹配报告」:匹配分数、化学反应点、摩擦预警、约会建议。像算命,但用的是数据。

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Sophieyou v1.0.0 MIT-0 10 files · 1 script body ≈ 1 531 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 3 d ago

As a process C 53/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerData and analyticsInfrastructurePersonal productivitytype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
B
89/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
72
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
53/100
Has gaps
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

  1. Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 5. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning description-no-when description does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when")
  • note frontmatter-key unknown frontmatter key "depends"

Process rating: all ten parameters 53/100

  • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
  • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
  • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
  • 100Steps. 48 steps
  • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1531 tokens
  • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
  • low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
  • -227 emoji in the instructions: noise for the model
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 396: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 30 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 48 items
  • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
  • +3All 1 scripts are documented

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 72.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This is a real compatibility-report skill, but it asks to collect broad logged-in social-media histories with weak consent, scoping, and privacy safeguards.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026