SKILLEMALL.ai

AB base-trader

Autonomous crypto trading on Base via Bankr. Use for trading tokens, monitoring launches, executing strategies, or managing a trading portfolio. Triggers on "trade", "buy", "sell", "launch", "snipe", "profit", "PnL", "portfolio balance", or any crypto trading task on Base.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Brandon v1.1.1 16 files · 2 scripts body ≈ 1 561 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

As a process B 75/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: result and completion

ProcedureInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
96/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
90
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
75/100
Nearly there
Result and completion w 14
0
Failures and branches w 10
55
When it triggers w 12
70
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 16. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 75/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 55Failures and branches. 1 branches
    • 70When it triggers. States when to use, but not when not to
    • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 66 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 1561 tokens
    • 100Running it twice. No mutating operations
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress
    • medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
    • low 12 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • -32 of 2 scripts are never mentioned in SKILL.md
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 3 example trigger phrases
    • +3Description length 273: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 34 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 66 items
    • +4Has examples (11 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (9 of 9)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 90.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill is not obviously malicious, but it can direct real crypto trades and automations with broad triggers and safety controls that are documented more strongly than they are enforced.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026