SKILLEMALL.ai

AD game-theory

Advanced game theory analysis for crypto protocols, DeFi mechanisms, governance systems, and strategic decision-making. Use when analyzing tokenomics, evaluating protocol incentives, predicting adversarial behavior, designing mechanisms, or understanding strategic interactions in web3.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Brandon v1.0.0 11 files body ≈ 2 546 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Advanced game theory analysis for crypto protocols, DeFi mechanisms, governance systems, and strategic decision-making.

As a process D 43/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: result and completion, when it triggers, inputs and preconditions

AnalyzerAI and agentsResearchtype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
95/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
88
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
D
43/100
Unfinished process
Result and completion w 14
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Failures and branches w 10
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 11. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 43/100

    • 0Result and completion. Does not say what the result is
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 30Running it twice. 7 mutating operations with no state check
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 100Steps. 93 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2546 tokens
    • low 10 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Output format is not stated: the model decides each time
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +3Description length 286: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 46 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 93 items
    • +4Has examples (1 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (8 of 8)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 88.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This is a markdown-only game theory reference skill for crypto protocol analysis, with some dual-use attack discussion but no hidden execution or privileged behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: benign · 10 Sept 2026