SKILLEMALL.ai
GitHub ↗ RU Sign in

AF answers

USE FOR AI-grounded answers via OpenAI-compatible /chat/completions. Two modes: single-search (fast) or deep research (enable_research=true, thorough multi-search). Streaming/blocking. Citations.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: springmint v1.0.0 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 2 053 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 3 d ago

As a process F 49/100 · Will not run — References files that are not bundled: ../../README.md

ProcedureAI and agentsResearchInfrastructuretype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
Runs in: OpenClaw Claude / Claude Code ChatGPT / Codex Gemini CLI Cursor GitHub Copilot / VS Code Qwen Code Kimi Code CLI Z.ai (GLM) DeepSeek (Deep Code) Mistral Vibe LangChain (deepagents) Goose OpenCode
JSON
Technical rating
A
92/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
81
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
F
49/100
Will not run
References files that are not bundled: ../../README.md
Tools and files w 18
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
When it triggers w 12
20
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten
This is a copy of a skill from another catalog; the rating counts the canonical one: answers (ClawHub)

How to improve

  1. The text references files that are not there: add them or drop the references.
For the model run — optional
  • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
  • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

Guard findings · 0

✓ No critical or high findings

Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

Against the Agent Skills spec

  • warning missing-ref reference to a missing file: ../../README.md

Process rating: all ten parameters 49/100

Will not run. References files that are not bundled: ../../README.md
  • 0Tools and files. 1 referenced file(s) missing: ../../README.md
  • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
  • 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
  • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
  • 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (answers) differs from the folder (cpbox-answers)
  • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
  • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
  • 70Inputs and preconditions. Inputs and preconditions are listed
  • 100Steps. 13 steps
  • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 2053 tokens
  • low 13 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
  • low The response is described with custom markup (6 tags): a typed call is more reliable

Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

Quality signals

  • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
  • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
  • +1No license
  • +2Single-language instructions
  • +3Description length 195: enough signal without eating the budget
  • +4Structure: 27 headings
  • +3Step-by-step instructions: 13 items
  • +3Output format is stated explicitly
  • +4Has examples (8 code blocks)

Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 81.

External checks

ClawHub: suspicious
This skill is a disclosed paid AI answer proxy, but it can automatically settle x402 payments without clear spending limits or per-request approval.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 29 May 2026