SKILLEMALL.ai

CC openclaw-listing-bot

|

ClawHub Agent Skills author: ssyopro v1.0.18 MIT-0 2 files body ≈ 688 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai↗ analyzed 7 d ago

|

As a process C 54/100 · Has gaps — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureData and analyticsSoftware developmentAI and agentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
C
85/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
62
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
C
54/100
Has gaps
When it triggers w 12
0
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Progress reporting w 2
0
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 2. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    • warning frontmatter-yaml SKILL.md: the frontmatter is not valid YAML (YAML parse error: Nested mappings are not allowed in compact mappings at line 9, column 15: category: display-name: OpenClaw Listing Bot ^ ); fields were read line by line. The usual cause is a colon inside an unquoted value
    • warning description-short description under 40 chars: too little signal for triggering

    Process rating: all ten parameters 54/100

    • 0When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
    • 30Running it twice. 3 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Tools and files. Uses tools (bash, python) that frontmatter does not declare
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Steps. 15 steps
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 688 tokens
    • low The response is described with custom markup (7 tags): a typed call is more reliable

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
    • +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
    • +3Description length 1: 120–800 characters recommended
    • -4Absolute local paths (C:\Users, /home/…): not portable
    • +1No license
    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +4Structure: 13 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 15 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 62.

    External checks

    ClawHub: suspicious
    This skill needs review because it directs an agent to repeatedly generate and publish new skills to shared folders and public marketplaces without clear human approval or security review.
    LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: · 16 Sept 2026