BD wurk-x402
Hire humans for microjobs (feedback, opinions, small tasks) and buy social growth services — all paid with USDC via x402 on Solana or Base.
As a process D 45/100 · Unfinished process — weak spots: when it triggers, inputs and preconditions, failures and branches
How to improve
- Say in the description WHEN to use the skill ("use when…", example requests): that is the agent's main cue.
For the model run — optional
- Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
- A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.
Guard findings · 3
✓ No critical or high findings
Medium and low: 3
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:48High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)# Solana: USDC (EPjF…t1v)
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:49High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential)# Base: USDC (0x83…913)
-
low Secrets in code
secret-high-entropy-tokenSKILL.md:377High-entropy token-like string (may be an id, hash or a credential) (placeholder value)spl-token balance EPjF…t1v --owner YOUR_ADDRESS
placeholder
Files scanned: 4. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.
Against the Agent Skills spec
- warning
description-no-whendescription does not say WHEN to use the skill (no "use when") - note
frontmatter-keyunknown frontmatter key "homepage"
Process rating: all ten parameters 45/100
- 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
- 0Failures and branches. Linear process with no failure handling
- 0Progress reporting. Says nothing while it works
- 20When it triggers. No condition that starts the skill
- 30Running it twice. 4 mutating operations with no state check
- 40Consistency. Frontmatter name (wurk-x402) differs from the folder (x402-wurk)
- 60Tools and files. Uses tools (web) that frontmatter does not declare
- 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
- 70Execution cost. Instruction body is 4053 tokens
- 100Steps. 43 steps
- medium Safety rules and hard prohibitions inside a skill: they belong in the system prompt, here they protect nothing
- low 11 top-level sections: this looks like several domains in one skill
Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.
Quality signals
- +5Description has no quoted example phrases that should trigger the skill
- +4Description does not say when NOT to use the skill (false activations)
- +1No license
- +2Single-language instructions
- +3Description length 139: enough signal without eating the budget
- +4Structure: 26 headings
- +3Step-by-step instructions: 43 items
- +3Output format is stated explicitly
- +4Has examples (20 code blocks)
Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 74.
External checks
ClawHub: suspicious
The skill is transparent about offering WURK payments, microjobs, and social-growth purchases, but it can spend real USDC and buy engagement or votes with weak guardrails.
LLM: suspicious (high) · VirusTotal: suspicious · 28 May 2026