SKILLEMALL.ai

AB docx-trackdiff

Compare two versions of a .docx document and produce a single Word file in tracked-changes (revision / tracking) mode, as if a human had edited the old file into the new one with Track Changes turned on. Use whenever the user has two versions of a DOCX (e.g., successive drafts of a paper, report, or contract — often AI-generated or AI-assisted revisions) and wants to see the differences as native Word revisions (insertions/deletions) that can be accepted/rejected in Word. Triggers: "对比两个版本的 docx", "tracked changes", "tracking mode", "修订模式对比", "compare two Word documents", "diff two drafts", "生成修订对比文件". Do NOT use for: creating new documents from scratch (use docx skill), single-file editing with revisions (use docx WIR engine), or PDF-only comparisons.

ClawHub Agent Skills author: Big Stephen v0.1.0 MIT-0 10 files body ≈ 760 tokens Open the sourceclawhub.ai analyzed 2 d ago

Compare two versions of a .docx document and produce a single Word file in tracked-changes (revision / tracking) mode, as if a human had edited the old file…

As a process B 76/100 · Nearly there — weak spots: inputs and preconditions, running it twice

ProcedureWordData and analyticsWriting and documentstype and topics are labelled automatically from the skill text
JSON
Technical rating
A
100/100
safety, quality, tests
Safety 60%
100
Quality 40%
100
Run on models
none yet
Process rating
B
76/100
Nearly there
Inputs and preconditions w 11
0
Running it twice w 4
30
Failures and branches w 10
50
the three weakest of ten parameters · all ten

How to improve

    For the model run — optional
    • Your own cases (evals/evals.json, 4–6 real requests with expected answers): the full check would then run those instead of a model-drafted suite.
    • A spec.yaml with trigger phrases and assertions — a behaviour contract for CI; `skilltest init` writes a template.

    Guard findings · 0

    ✓ No critical or high findings

    Files scanned: 9. Evidence is masked. Grey chips explain why severity was lowered.

    Against the Agent Skills spec

    ✓ No remarks against the Agent Skills spec

    Process rating: all ten parameters 76/100

    • 0Inputs and preconditions. Does not say what the process needs to start
    • 30Running it twice. 2 mutating operations with no state check
    • 50Failures and branches. 0 branches, has a failure section
    • 60Result and completion. Output format stated, no completion criterion
    • 100Tools and files. No external tools needed
    • 100Steps. 11 steps
    • 100When it triggers. States when to use and when not to
    • 100Consistency. Name and required fields are in place
    • 100Execution cost. Instruction body is 760 tokens
    • 100Progress reporting. Reports progress

    Everything here is measured from the skill text rather than judged by a model, so the numbers are checkable. A parameter weighs more when it is a more common reason for the process to stall.

    Quality signals

    • +2Single-language instructions
    • +5Description quotes 7 example trigger phrases
    • +4Description says when NOT to use the skill
    • +3Description length 762: enough signal without eating the budget
    • +4Structure: 4 headings
    • +3Step-by-step instructions: 11 items
    • +3Output format is stated explicitly
    • +4Has examples (3 code blocks)
    • +4Reference files are cited in the instructions (1 of 1)
    • +3All 2 scripts are documented
    • +1License stated

    Quality base 70; lint remarks subtract, signals add up to 100. Result: 100.

    External checks

    ClawHub: clean
    This skill locally compares two user-provided DOCX files and writes a tracked-changes DOCX, with no evidence of hidden data access, network upload, persistence, or unrelated behavior.
    LLM: benign (high) · VirusTotal: · 15 Aug 2026